Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-13 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-05-13 House Journal Page 1599 SB 95 Representative Gatto brought up reconsideration of the vote on SB 95 am H (page 1570). The following was again before the House in third reading: 2003-05-13 House Journal Page 1600 SENATE BILL NO. 95 am H "An Act relating to strikes by employees of, and unilateral actions by, municipal school districts, regional educational attendance areas, or state boarding schools, and requiring notice of at least 72 hours of a strike by those employees or of a unilateral action by those employers to the other party." Representative Gatto moved and asked unanimous consent that SB 95 am H be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of rescinding previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1. Objection was heard. The question being: "Shall SB 95 am H be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of rescinding previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 95 am H--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Return to Second/Rescind Previous Action/Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 29 NAYS: 7 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Gara, Gruenberg, Kerttula, Moses Excused: Croft, Joule, Kapsner, Kookesh And so, SB 95 am H was returned to second reading. Representative Gatto moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1. Representative Crawford objected and withdrew the objection. There being no further objection, the House rescinded previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1 and the new title follows: 2003-05-13 House Journal Page 1601 SENATE BILL NO. 95 "An Act relating to strikes by employees of a municipal school district, a regional educational attendance area, or a state boarding school, and requiring notice of at least 72 hours of a strike by those employees." Amendment No. 1 (page 1569) was before the House. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 95--RECONSIDERATION Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Cissna, Crawford, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Heinze, Kerttula, Moses Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Hawker, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Wilson, Wolf Excused: Croft, Joule, Kapsner, Kookesh Absent: Berkowitz, Williams And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall SB 95 pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 95--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 30 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 4 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Moses, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf 2003-05-13 House Journal Page 1602 Nays: Cissna, Crawford, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kerttula Excused: Croft, Joule, Kapsner, Kookesh Absent: Gara And so, SB 95 passed the House on reconsideration, was signed by the Speaker and Chief Clerk and returned to the Senate.